Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:27

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
In NBA Finals, Thunder vs. Pacers reinvigorates league’s competitive soul - Andscape
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Has anyone ever worn leather pants? Are they comfortable?
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Royals Promote Jac Caglianone - MLB Trade Rumors
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
346 Million-Year-Old Fossil Rewrites the Story of Life on Land - SciTechDaily
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
7 storylines to watch with All-Star voting underway - MLB.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do people believe that global warming is man made?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Iran holds funeral procession for top commanders killed in Israeli strikes - Financial Times